Friday, March 20, 2009

Just When You Thought Bush Couldn't Look Any Worse

Thanks to economist Paul Krugman's blog, I saw this Washington Post article describing how various appointments to key positions in Iraq were made by the Bush Administration. Krugman brings it up in the context of how conservatives tend to use their own failures in government to prove that government doesn't work (talk about a self-fulfilling prophecy!). It's something that's been happening more and more during the early days of Obama's presidency, with the response to Katrina and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan being the most commonly-offered examples.

Reading the Post article, it's easy to see how the Iraq occupation has turned into the disaster that it has. It sounds like people were screened not for necessary skills or experience, but rather for loyalty to Bush/Cheney and idealogical leanings. Consider this section:

"A 24-year-old who had never worked in finance -- but had applied for a White House job -- was sent to reopen Baghdad's stock exchange. The daughter of a prominent neoconservative commentator and a recent graduate from an evangelical university for home-schooled children were tapped to manage Iraq's $13 billion budget, even though they didn't have a background in accounting."

Readers may sometimes wonder why I make such a big deal out of the fact that Obama is at least trying to find the best people for each position... well, wonder no more!

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

A friend of mine who went to Harvard knew someone who was living in Iraq and directly making policy right after he graduated. He was about 24 at the time and the son of a well known republican. It's crazy to know that it wasn't all that rare an occurrence.

cjguerra said...

Talk about pork-barreling on an epic scale! They couldn't even find old boys from the old-boys-network to give the money to: they had to also give it to their sons and grandsons! No wonder the war was so expensive.

Anonymous said...

That is just so wrong

cjguerra said...

Heh - which is wrong? The dripping cynicism or that it may be the correct assessment? I'd have to say both because it's a nasty business all around. Although thick rhetoric doesn't really cost anything...